[Paine in the Neck]

I perhaps didn't express that well. I know that "No." is an abbreviation for "Number". What I'm asking is if the know what "No." is counting so that we can make sense of whether "2" or "47O44" are reasonable numbers to expect.

[Paine in the Neck]

“if the know” should be “if we know”

[Kells]

I perhaps didn't express that well. I know that "No." is an abbreviation for "Number". What I'm asking is if the know what "No." is counting so that we can make sense of whether "2" or "47O44" are reasonable numbers to expect.

One of the BC's must be fake since they could not plausibly have the same book and page numbers. The first Kenyan BC had "47644" in the "No." field.

I think "47644" is a far more reasonable number to expect than "2". Another thing is the implausibility of finding the Australian BC just by searching on Google.

The implausible number "2" and the implausible finding on Google after publication of the Kenyan BC makes it almost certain that the Australian BC is a fake.