[pissant]

If Koyaan says the Bomford doc is real, then I’d say it’s a fake.

[editor-surveyor]

He said it was fake.

[stevestras]

“If Koyaan says the Bomford doc is real, then I’d say it’s a fake.

So, if I am following this right, Koyaan found an Australian BC that looks like it might have been the template for a fake Obama Kenyan BC. But, this Koyaan person is a long time hater of freerepublic and the constitutionalists?

I’m trying to catch up and am finding the various threads somewhat confusing. At first, I thought the whole Kenyan BC thing was dead. Now, it seems like the Australian is the fake and the Kenyan is still not authenticated.

[mojitojoe]

If Koyaan says the Bomford doc is real, then I’d say it’s a fake.
___________
LOL. I agree

[dalight]

It took me forever to read this thread. I agree that Bomford and Kenyan BC cannot co-exist. However, as we review the bidding. Orly has a physical copy of the Kenyan BC, any document examiner worth anything could and should be able to see if this was offset, letterpress, ink jet or laser. That is what is so powerful about having the document rather than just seeing an image. It is very likely that this document, the Kenya BC, was letter press, hard to imagine it even offset in Kenya in 1964. This should show like a sore thumb under magnification. And, photoshop is not so good getting lead type into place, at least I don't have a lead type plugin for mine.

Bomford has the printers mark at the bottom.. but Bomford only exists for us as an electronic document, forever beyond the reach of a loop. It is the more likely fake, and they should have to cough the original up, more so, lots of Aussie BC's are being posted here and none is similar to Bomford.

The answer is in finding a Kenyan comparable, WND claims one and the should produce it immediately.

[386wt]

If Koyaan says the Bomford doc is real, then I’d say it’s a fake.

Not only that but he "discovered it"!