“OK, wait a minute. Why is the original so much more low-resolution than the supposedly modified version?
Was there a higher-resolution photo of the original that got modified (but the photo of that original apparently wasnt available to you to post)?
It makes no sense if were saying that that top photo was the one that was altered into the higher-resolution, much sharper fake on the bottom photo.
And I can see the difference between the K and E, but I sure cant see a 6 instead of an O in the number. Even on max zoom level.”
Because the modified version was never modified! Someone ‘sharpened’ the original, and that modified a few pixels that now make the ‘E’ look more like a ‘K’.
“Because the modified version was never modified! Someone sharpened the original, and that modified a few pixels that now make the E look more like a K.”
OK, I admit I haven’t been reading every single post here — actually, far from it — so I might be a little behind. But it still makes no sense to me. You’re saying that the original is the higher-resolution bottom photo? And someone modified it to change the “E” to a “K” and the “O” to a “6”? And, in the process of modifying it, not only sharpened it but also drastically reduced its resolution down to what you see in the top photo? So basically the reverse of what was being claimed by the starter of this thread?
What the?