[old curmudgeon]

I asked this question a few minutes ago and \had a connection problem, so it may appear twice and if so, I apologize.

Where are these forms generated? In the original country or province?

Or are they drawn up from a master registry in England?

If the latter, then they would be on the same form and if withing Lavendar’s career span, be signed by him.

If they are drawn up in the country of birth, then they must be fake because Lavender is not going to be in both countries.

So where do these docs originate?

[Bigh4u2]

Since Australia in 1959 was still a part of Great Britain and Kenya was under the control of Britain, I would assume that these forms were standard and generated in London for distribution to Britain’s different holdings at the time.

I really doubt that each area under Britain’s control would have their own forms.

[leilani]

Or are they drawn up from a master registry in England? If the latter, then they would be on the same form and if withing Lavendar’s career span, be signed by him. If they are drawn up in the country of birth, then they must be fake because Lavender is not going to be in both countries.

Yet both the Resistrar & Deputy Registrar in Kenya & Australia have the same last name and middle initial but a different first initial. What are the odds? The first initial of each Australian official, Lavender & Miller, has obviously been fudged to produce the Kenyan fake - the forger took the easy way out. He left the same book number, same page number for both the Australian & the phony Kenyan BC.

The Kenya BC is a fake. Just no getting around it. Expect more forgeries, people. It serves the left's and Obama's purposes too well to make conservatives look like fools. THAT's the conspiricy freepers need to be all hyped up about, not this pointless birth certificate stuff.