It’s a coin IMO.
That document was created to satisfy the identity requirements to finalize the divorce proceedings. For that purpose, it was good enough. Custody was established.
At that time, there was no Hawaii birth record, or she would have used it.
The entire charade commenced with the need to conceal paternity.
After the divorce was granted, a Hawaii record MAY have been established.
The questions remain. Where was he born and who was the father?
And for good measure, I will ask it again:
WHERE WAS STANLEY ANN FROM THE TIME SHE GRADUATED IN 1960 AND WHEN SHE SHOWED UP WITH A TWO OR THREE YEAR OLD IN HAWAII.
Moscow
WHERE WAS STANLEY ANN FROM THE TIME SHE GRADUATED IN 1960 AND WHEN SHE SHOWED UP WITH A TWO OR THREE YEAR OLD IN HAWAII.
It is well documented that Stanley Anne Dunham enrolled in classes at the University of Washington within 15 days of having had BH0 (if 4 Aug is his actual birth date). Where she was before is certainly unclear, but it does seem reasonable to believe that she was in Seattle for the time period before her return to Hawaii.