Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pissant

...

I’m using something a bit more powerful than Windows Picture and Fax Viewer there, ‘Ace’. You can’t ‘zoom’ past the information that’s there. If it’s illegible at high zoom, it doesn’t get MORE legible at less zoom.


302 posted on 08/03/2009 4:13:27 PM PDT by Adammon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies ]


To: Adammon

Then you need glasses and lessons in picture viewing, ace. Cause your image sucks eggs.


320 posted on 08/03/2009 4:18:20 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies ]

To: Adammon
You can’t ‘zoom’ past the information that’s there. If it’s illegible at high zoom, it doesn’t get MORE legible at less zoom.

Actually, it does. At high zoom, you are just magnifying the JPEG artifacts and averaging errors. Such a magnified image is actually harder for the human eye to read. It confuses the human visual system, keeping it from seeing the forest for the trees, so to speak.

To see what I mean, look at this. Then step back across the room from your monitor and look again.

If you zoom into a small image of a face, expecting to count the zits, you not only can't see the zits, the face itself becomes harder to recognize. Same goes for text.

The above image by the way illustrates the effect of magnifying averaging errors. It contains no JPEG artifacts. They just compound the problem.

408 posted on 08/03/2009 4:51:59 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson