His name is Bishop Ron McRae.
He is the one that started the whole debate over where Obama was born.
Once Obama's supporters figure out this whole debate started with Bishop Ron McRae, they'll use his background to undermine the credibility of the entire Birther movement.
Its looking more and more like the Kenyan 1964 document is legitimate (why would they expend so much effort in underming it without successfully calling into question its primary facts), so the next phase will be to associate the Birther movement with Bishop Ron McRae's checkered background.
We need to be one step ahead of the Obamabots. That means getting out ahead of their next step to undermine the credibility of the origins of this claim.
BFLR
That phone interview was always way down on my list and was not what made me initially suspicious. I became suspicious simply because he refused to release other documents and things didn’t add up, plus the lies in his book and the lies that came out of his ugly, blue lips.
That will be tough to do. The Obamites are already posting bogus certificates which appear superficially like the one Dr. Orly had posted. It will be hard to undermine the underminers, unless the fakes are promptly identified as such, provided the image Dr. Orly has is that of a genuine document.
It may be that they are all fakes, and that done to undermine the entire issue, which remains a question of Obama's Natural Born Citizen status, regardless of where he was born.
If the Obamites can obscure the seminal issue (and they have been trying all along), they will.