Replies

I thought the document Orly has and is trying to authenticate is something supplied in 1964 when it was requested. It is something similar to the Hawaii form but has more info, but NEITHER is the actual birth certificate.

With one correction, I think so, although it's not exactly clear from their article. (The correction is that Orly doesn't have the document. She only has a photo of the document. There is a big difference between the two, from a legal perspective.)

Does Kenya disclaim that ANY form like Orly’s exists???

The article doesn't say that, but does say that "Moreover, the African nation was the Dominion of Kenya until December 1964, after declaring independence in 1961. Kenya was not officially the Republic of Kenya until some 10 months after the Feb. 17, 1964, date on which the Taitz document purportedly was certified."

“The article doesn’t say that, but does say that “Moreover, the African nation was the Dominion of Kenya until December 1964, after declaring independence in 1961. Kenya was not officially the Republic of Kenya until some 10 months after the Feb. 17, 1964, date on which the Taitz document purportedly was certified.”

This is the sort of thing that discredits WND—the declaration of independence was Oct. 1963, not 1961; “Dominion” has been proposed as what Kenya called itself in the interim but I’ve not seen proof of that. WND’s own hard-to-read 1964 document simply has “Government of Kenya” on it.

They’re sloppy. They’ve obviously not followed the details of the research here on FR. They don’t know 1/10 of what the Freeper who’s followed these threads knows.

I don’t doubt that the Taitz doc may be a fake, but this article from WND is next to useless. And they probably know it—they just want the clicker to spin round and round and round.

AND THIS was the bombshell that Farah was Twittering about yesterday? After saying on Sunday that they had similar-appearing Kenyan documents?

Farah’s a goof.