This is on Worldnetdaily today:
"Among the criticisms, and the responses linked on the Taitz site:
"Criticism: The number 44-O-47 is coincidental as President Obama is the 44th president, and was 47 years old. Response: The number is 44,047, with a "zero," not an "O."
"Criticism: The name E.F. (Earth Friendly) Lavender is a soap. Response: Also the name of a plant. Lavendar also is a SURNAME!"
Thus according to WND, and their reading of Orly's site, the correct name and number is E.F. Lavendar and 47,044.
In order to believe that the Kenyan document is genuine, you have to accept that:
- Kenya coincidentally used the same data format as adopted by all Australian states, but not Canada, New Zealand, the UK etc or any other Commonwealth country. Same data, same order of data, the works.
- That Kenya used a printed form with the format exactly the same as a purported South Australia birth certificate, and which differs in minor details from verified Victorian, New South Wales, and Queensland BCs,which use the same Australian standard data.
- That Kenya priced their BC is a foreign currency, and put the price (in Australian pounds) in exactly the same place as on the purported South Australian BC.
A price of a supposed "US" Government document marked only in pesos, rather than dollars, and with the price in exactly the same place as a purported Mexican Government document that looks identical apart from the crest, would be equally improbable.