Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kandy
This is the first paragraph from Orly's Court Filing and should explain why I think she just has a copy and not the document itself.

" The undersigned counsel for Plaintiffs has acquired possession of a color copy of one certain document (attached as Exhibit A to this motion), regarding which there are no ready means of authentication except by recovery of the original document. As should be apparent from the nature and content of the document, if authenticated, and shown to be genuine, the contents of this document will significantly narrow and shorten the discovery and pre-trial litigation period necessary in this case, and might lead to an early resolution by settlement or transfer of these proceedings to the United States House of Representatives and Senate according the procedures outlined in the Constitution."

1,888 posted on 08/04/2009 11:37:19 AM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1870 | View Replies ]


To: InterceptPoint

*UUUUUUUGHHH*

That just makes me nauseous reading it. So Orly doesn’t even have the original document, she has a copy from *Source anonymous for protection*, but she’s asking the court to grant her access to the official records to verify its authenticity.

This just seems backwards.


1,891 posted on 08/04/2009 11:39:28 AM PDT by Adammon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1888 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson