[Fred Nerks]

I'm going nuts! What have we here? Father and son?

[MHGinTN]

Yes, the names are father and son, but the document exhibit for the son is a fake manufactured from the data on the Kenyan exhibit, and done by one very sick puppy named koyaan (named Smith, IIRC). Friend of LorenC, another character assassin trying to smear Ron Polarik.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

Damn....are we having fun yet...?

[Electric Graffiti]

I'm going nuts! What have we here? Father and son?

Yup....and a Yusef Islam song. ;)

[SirJohnBarleycorn]

The Coat of Arms at the top of the birth certificate DOES appear to be correct.

According to this site, which has already been cited a couple of times in this thread, (http://www.ngw.nl/int/aus/southaus.htm) the coat of arms for South Australia between 1936 and 1984 was:

That site goes on to say as follows:

The arms also used a female figure holding a conucopia and a sheaf of barley, as well as a farmer holding a pair of shears and a fleece of wool as supporters. The crest showed a staff with a banner with the five stars of the Southern Cross and a lion. The motto was 'Faith and Courage.'

You can see that at the top of the Bomford birth certificate, the words "FAITH AND COURAGE" appear across the bottom of the arms, and you can see a man (no doubt, the farmer) on the right and a figure in flowing robes (no doubt, the female) on the left.

So, the coat of arms appears genuine.

[wndawmn666]

Has anyone commented on the difference in the number 1 as shown in the ‘Date and Place of Birth’ on the Aussie BC?

Check out the 1 where it says he was born on 10th April and then check out the 1 for 1959. The first 1 is completely different than all of the others on the document.

I haven’t made it to the end of this thread yet so I’m not sure if anyone else has mentioned it.

Thanks,