What do you mean “enforce” it? How the hell can I enforce anything? I wouldn’t “enforce” you into so much as flicking a booger if you didn’t feel like it. I’m just telling you, this issue will do nothing. You won’t chance upon the “out” that gets rid of Obama. You’ve got to beat this guy with ideas, you need a vision for America that exceeds his. Do you have it? Because the polls say otherwise at the moment.
That is what they said about the Impeachment process, too.
And true, we did not get the man convicted, let alone pushed out of the WH but he was inpeached!
If this isn't your issue then why oppose it?
If gun rights is not your issue do you oppose those who are excited about gun rights?
Or if prolife issues don't excite you, do you get on those threads and try to talk people out of their motivation to pursue that issue?
If not on those issue, then why on this one?
domenads' hysteria on this is flawed and defies the laws of logic. Pursuing the truth on the BC issue does not mean we cannot pursue other issues or promote ideas. It is not an either-or proposition.
The irony is domenonads spends all his time discouraging rather than inspiring and people who do that usually have very little ability to inspire people about any idea.
Were you alive during Watergate?
The same claims could have been made at the time. That Nixon's enemies were wasting their time and making themselves foolish by pursuing a two-bit burglary conspiracy.
I recall reading articles for weeks which appeared practically on the last page of my local newspaper. High ranking officials by the dozens assured people that there was nothing there.
By the end, over sixty people were convicted of felonies, articles of impeachment were ready to pass against Nixon, and the President finally resigned in disgrace.
The key to Watergate was that the entire machinery of the federal government was put to work maintaining the conspiracy and most of the media were afraid to ask questions. Afraid, perhaps, of being added to Nixon's enemies list.
I would suggest that you first make your best determination as to what is the truth, and then dedicate yourself to exposing that truth; especially in a case like this where the information to debunk the conspiracy should be so readily available.
Most reasonable people would have thought it ridiculous to believe that Dan Rather would base his attack on George Bush on such blatantly forged documents. But it did happen.
If Obama has nothing to hide, then why is he hiding so much?