[the invisib1e hand]

Actually, it's the opposite, but thank you for your admission of total ignorance as to why. We need it less because of technology. It's the concentration of capital that is driving this, not technology, It is a corporate feeding frenzy at the expense of socialized risk.

I think barbituates might help you. But only in moderation.

[Carry_Okie]

I think barbituates might help you. But only in moderation.

That would be "barbiturates." If you're too inept to use a spell-check in the box in which you are posting, I suggest you refrain from trying to make a point by ad hominem attack, much less advocate how everybody else should accept the suicidal idea of acceding to a global police state.

The central reason global governance is inherently disastrous is that it is unrestricted power without recourse, one stop shopping for every power freak with money on the planet (which is why it was proposed by global financial interests in the first place). Global government is in no way subject to the moderating influence of competition. It is by nature corrupt, irreversible, incompetent, unaccountable, and tyrannical.

Apparently you like that idea, just like every other would-be-pig throughout history.