Replies

WND article states they are similar. As I said earlier, it might be possible for WND to be SO STUPID and SO BLIND as to not notice that that the name of the NATION is different on the documents. However, that is quite unlikely.

There's a more innocent explanation.

The article says, "WND was able to obtain other birth certificates from Kenya for purposes of comparison, and the form of the documents appear to be identical. "

Perhaps WND compared the document with others that were dated AFTER Dec 12th 1964.

If so, the comparison documents would definitely have the header and seal of "Republic of Kenya", and no discrepancy would be seen.

If they didn't have any comparison docs dated earlier, then they would have (innocently) missed an opportunity to evaluate the validity of the document.

If you saw the newspaper article in this thread, it clearly shows that people were referring to Kenya as ‘Republic of Kenya’.

By "people", you mean the Nevada Palladium Times right? The Nevada Palladium Times, famous experts on international affairs and county fairs?

When the Nevada Palladium times writes, the people of the world have spoken?

No one is claiming that the 1963 constitution calls Kenya the ‘Republic of Kenya’.

Yeah only about 200 people were, all wrong.

In fact, there is evidence that ‘Republic of Kenya’ was being used at that time as even in that newspaper photo Red Steel posted in this thread.

The 1963 Nevada Palladium Times is a legendary arbiter of truth in world affairs! You've got to be their biggest fan.