Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BCrago66
Interesting article. I hadn't known BB&T was FORCED to take TARP money. From the article:

Mr. Allison says the government forced BB&T and some other healthy banks to accept TARP money to obscure that they were simply trying to save several large banks like Citigroup.

“Everyone thinks we got some kind of subsidy,” he says, noting that his company paid the money back in June, with interest. “It’s going to cost us about $250 million for money we didn’t want.”

Can't help but think that the gov used TARP to rob the banks.

2 posted on 08/02/2009 6:02:30 AM PDT by Shannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Shannon
Gob bless Mr. Allison for being one of the few in the banking industry to stand up to FedGov! BB&T was the first, and maybe, only bank to announce it would not loan money for development of properties confiscated through the legal loophole of the Kelo v. City of New London court ruling.
3 posted on 08/02/2009 6:17:37 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or, are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Shannon

Bank and other financial institutions live under regulatory regimes that allow so much discretion on the part of the regulators, that they can be forced to take actions against their own interests. There’s a constant blackmail/extortion threat.


4 posted on 08/02/2009 6:18:28 AM PDT by BCrago66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson