Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AP sources: Military-civilian terror prison eyed (Obama still trying to bring GITMO to US soil)
yahoo ^ | 8/2/2009 | ap

Posted on 08/02/2009 4:02:59 AM PDT by tobyhill

The Obama administration is looking at creating a courtroom-within-a-prison complex in the U.S. to house suspected terrorists, combining military and civilian detention facilities at a single maximum-security prison.

Several senior U.S. officials said the administration is eyeing a soon-to-be-shuttered state maximum security prison in Michigan and the 134-year-old military penitentiary at Fort Leavenworth, Kan., as possible locations for a heavily guarded site to hold the 229 suspected al-Qaida, Taliban and foreign fighters now jailed at the Guantanamo Bay detention camp in Cuba.

The officials outlined the plans — the latest effort to comply with President Barack Obama's order to close the prison camp by Jan. 22, 2010, and satisfy congressional and public fears about incarcerating terror suspects on American soil — on condition of anonymity because the options are under review.

White House spokesman Ben LaBolt said Friday that no decisions have been made about the proposal. But the White House considers the courtroom-prison complex as the best among a series of bad options, an administration official said.

For months, government lawyers and senior officials at the Pentagon, Justice Department and the White House have struggled with how to close the internationally reviled U.S. Navy prison at Guantanamo.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 08/02/2009 4:02:59 AM PDT by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

BS. They don’t have the time. They are moving inmates around at ADX in Florence, CO in hopes of sending them there. I think they just need to add the funds to expand ADX and use it.

Better yet, do what Bush said and keep them in Gitmo.

It has to be tough to be a naive President.


2 posted on 08/02/2009 4:08:39 AM PDT by wireplay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wireplay

As soon as they are moved here then they get more rights than they have now, including bond hearings.


3 posted on 08/02/2009 4:12:16 AM PDT by tobyhill (The Communist are here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

ACLU will have many of them wondering our streets within a few months after they arrive.


4 posted on 08/02/2009 4:17:46 AM PDT by CMailBag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Doubt it.

The ADX guys don’t have a lot of rights althogh the TOTUS has allowed the shoe bomber more access (strikes me as naive).


5 posted on 08/02/2009 4:23:32 AM PDT by wireplay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Military/Civilian Prison in U.S. Hummm, terrorists huh, interesting.


6 posted on 08/02/2009 4:46:17 AM PDT by Marty62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Obama I have a plan 2008:White House have struggled with how to close the internationally reviled U.S. Navy prison at Guantanamo.
The only plan Obama has is failure and it’s working.


7 posted on 08/02/2009 4:47:44 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wireplay; tobyhill
Doubt it. The ADX guys don’t have a lot of rights...

Doubt it again.

The ADX inmates are largely already convicted.

When foreign terrorists start arriving on our soil and gaming the US judicial system, along with the complicity of liberal Federal judges and the full force and power of the ACLU and the MSM, - at your expense, of course - then they will have rights aplenty until conviction and the exhaustion of appeals.

And many of them will walk.

8 posted on 08/02/2009 4:59:10 AM PDT by bill1952 (Choice is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

If you listen carefully, perhaps there is a whisper within our military of what they’re going to have to do to protect the constitution (their oath) against Obama.


9 posted on 08/02/2009 6:03:48 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

Valid point. I stand corrected.


10 posted on 08/02/2009 1:04:10 PM PDT by wireplay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson