[tired1]

I read the article but don’t understand the specifics of the new law. What are the dangers?

[atomic conspiracy]

This site, Food Freedom, provides a good overview of the objections to 2749. Beyond that, it is rather ominous that an urban communard like John Dingel is the chief sponsor.

[manapua]

I read the article but don’t understand the specifics of the new law. What are the dangers?

Among many others... increased regulatory burdens (annual registration fees to the USDA, increased meddling, increased bookkeeping costs, and the forced usage of high-tech and high-priced food tracking systems).

From what I can tell, about 60-70% of the local food movement is going to get a painful lesson in the consequences of their voting habits. Leftist lemmings who rail against ConAgra and Monsanto (and with whom I often agree) keep supporting the douches that are handing those corporations control over our food production.

[FromLori]

Have a backyard garden? You could be subject to warrantless searchs or not allowed to grow one at all.

The bill that passed does only two things……..it seizes control of food production and supply and then hands it over to big agri-corporations.

The remaining content of the bill is a primer on enforcement……meaning all the powers they have granted themselves to prevent you from claiming Constitutional protections, and enabling them to violate your rights on multiple levels…..all for food safety of course.

And

http://www.sodahead.com/question/475961/strange-martial-law-via-food-controlhr-2749/

[Brad’s Gramma]

Bump to read the replies to your question...