Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: whodathunkit
She now understands that not making a choice is giving sanction to the Looters.

I don't understand this. If she knows that NOT making a choice (NOT taking charge?) is giving sanction to the looters, why is she doing it - effectively giving her sanction?


9 posted on 08/01/2009 9:13:12 AM PDT by definitelynotaliberal (So how about, in honor of the American soldier, ya quit making things up? - Gov. Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: definitelynotaliberal
If she knows that NOT making a choice (NOT taking charge?) is giving sanction to the looters, why is she doing it - effectively giving her sanction?

Rand demonstrates it well in the next chapter (I'll try to avoid spoilers here) with Dagny's interaction with a guard.

The concept that I'm referring to is the act of indecision. How can indecision be an act? I'll let others better able to articulate the definition do so but will demonstrate how it works.

Those of us who are blessed with raising teenagers have probably heard the retort 'whatever' in response to any number of requests made of them. The proper rejoinder is thus-

"Since 'whatever' encompasses such a vast array of possibilities, I'll select from this list of chores that need done...." You can see how the vagueness of the 'whatever' can be used against them (for their own good ,of course:) ).

Dagny has been saying 'whatever' for a long time, that allowed the Looters to make her decisions for her. She was abdicating her responsibilities by _not_ making a choice.

12 posted on 08/01/2009 9:30:04 AM PDT by whodathunkit (Shrugging as I leave for the Gulch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson