Replies

I don’t find either of those negative items especially convincing.

I saw the full version of the grandmother’s comments about witnessing Obama’s birth some time ago. My conclusion was that, of course it’s not proof, any more than the shorter version was proof. She might have misremembered, or misspoke, or something of the kind.

But it seems equally probable that she blurted out the truth and then, a bit late, remembered that Obozo’s agents had warned her NEVER TO SPEAK ABOUT Obama’s birth in Kenya.

In support of that, we have a little further evidence. In an early interview with the press, granny said that the whole family was Muslim. Then last year she was interviewed and said that the whole family was Christian. Then early this year she said she was planning to go on the Haj to Mecca.

What do we make of that? Pretty obviously, the most probable reading of these contradictions is that she told the truth, and then was warned to keep her mouth shut about all those Muslim connections during the campaign, and then was told, OK, you can be a Muslim again now that he has been inaugurated.

There was also some evidence that most of Obama’s remaining family in Kenya was under house arrest last fall, kept away from any contact with the press. (The same with his white granny in Hawaii.)

What about Fukino’s recent statement? Well, what would you do if the Chicago Democrat Machine instructed you to release such a statement? Would it need a horse’s head in your bed? Or a dead cat on the porch? Sorry, but I find it hard to believe that she said one thing a year ago and now something rather different now, but pretended that it was just a repetition of the earlier statement.

No, we don’t KNOW that Obama was born in Kenya. But neither do we KNOW that he was born in Hawaii. There are far too many records being kept under wraps. There is a surprising lack of witnesses.