Clearing the Smoke on Obama’s Eligibility: An Intelligence Investigator’s June 10 Report
I asked the Dept of Health what they currently ask for (in 2008) to back up a parent’s claim that a child was born in Hawaii. I was told that all they required was a proof of residence in Hawaii (e.g. a driver’s license [We know from interviews with her friends on Mercer Island in Washington State that Ann Dunham had acquired a driver’s license by the summer of 1961 at the age of 17] or telephone bill) and pre-natal (statement or report that a woman was pregnant) and post-natal (statement or report that a new-born baby has been examined) certification by a physician. On further enquiry, the employee that I spoke to informed me that the pre-natal and post-natal certifications had probably not been in force in the ‘60s. Even if they had been, there is and was no requirement for a physician or midwife to witness, state or report that the baby was born in Hawaii.
Now enough of this. If you want to be fooled by the Liar in Chief, that's YOUR choice. But stop trying to deter others. You are NOT going to change anyone's opinion.
Nice post. I really could care less about his birth place but what I want to see is the adoption papers. Indonesians cannot be dual citizens. In order for him to go to school he would have had to surrender his citizenship (regular or Natural in the USA and become an Indonesian citizen)..I suspect (but we have nothing) is that he applied to school as a foreign national and traveled on an Indonesian passport signifying the adoption was completed. He would then have to re-elect citizenship (at majority) through naturalization. I doubt he did that. What we really have in the White House is a blank. He will not permit us to know who he is.
Why di you knee-jerk response and fail to answer the question!
Lets try again:
So you acknowledge that the newspaper announcement shows that Obama *DID* get a state of Hawaii birth records, right?
And he got it between Aug 4, 1961 and Aug 13, 1961 and it shows him born on Aug 4, 1961, right?
Again ... this “fooled by the Liar in Chief” is BS. None of this is based on what Obama said. We are talking about drawing conclusions from a Honolulu Advertiser birth announcement from Aug 13, 1961. I assure, 10 day old BHO did *not* put this announcement in there.