“I know of a lot of Constitutionalists that want to see all his records.”
Let me break to you plain:
1. I am a Constitutionalist, of the Scalia/Thomas type.
2. I want to see Obama’s records. That would be great. He has hid alot.
3. I believe the evidence is clear that Obama was born in Honolulu
4. I believe based on #3 and based on 14th amendment Obama is eligible to be President.
Now ... are we in 100% agreement? If not, where do we differ? and how does ‘Constitutionalist’ help distinguish our positions if we are not in the same camp on #3 and #4?
Clearly there are “Disagree with #3” types and “Disagree with #4” types.
Because you can't accept Obama's ties to Factcheck.
4. I believe based on #3 and based on 14th amendment Obama is eligible to be President.
Have you bothered to read anything about it? Like the John Binghams statements and WHY it was written?