Hardly, if he attended as a citizen of a foreign power.
Passport records are relevent, but any such suit is nothing more than a fishing expedition on this point without any evidence for such a renunciation.
Again, the burden of proof is on him, not us. We're talking about the Presidency of the United States.
His, and your, disregard for his real or even perceived lack of legitimacy in office is breath-taking.
I would like to point up the fact that not only are we now battling the obfuscations and attacks of the Obama faction, the Republican political establishment is now fully engaged in attempting to belittle and marginalize millions of Americans who simply want iron-clad proof that the Constitution of the United States is being observed and followed.
Interesting, in light of the myriad ways in which that same political establishment, of both “major” parties, continues to show such little regard for that document and their sworn oaths to uphold and defend it.
“College is irrelevent”
“Hardly, if he attended as a citizen of a foreign power. “
Still irrelevent, even if that particular fairy tale were true. (Its not.) You dont lose natural-born US citizenship status due to some other national citizenship. See Perkins v Elg.
“Again, the burden of proof is on him, not us.”
He has given sufficient validation of being born in Hawaii, and there is zero evidence he ever renounced his US citizenship. Dismissing those facts while demanding irrelevent documentation is ‘guilty until proven innocent’ stuff.