[Tublecane]

“As much a citizen, yes. NBC,nope.”

How can one be denied presidential access if one’s status is equivalent to a natural born citizen (in fact, is a natural born citizen, which is saying the same thing)? Not being eligible would mean you are of a seperate class from natural borns, which automatically means you’re not “as much a citizen” as they.

[Lower55]

As much a citizen, yes just not natural born.

[WOSG]

“As much a citizen, yes. NBC,nope.” How can one be denied presidential access if one’s status is equivalent to a natural born citizen (in fact, is a natural born citizen, which is saying the same thing)? Not being eligible would mean you are of a seperate class from natural borns, which automatically means you’re not “as much a citizen” as they.

Which in turn violates the 14th amendment and its interpretation in SCOTUS ruling Wong Kim Ark. It's strange that these purported defenders of the Constitution are eager to under-interpret/ignore parts of it that hurt their case.