“The Beatles were the end all be all to the 1953 through 1957 crowd. (although really the later part of that group were all into Jazz) And they’ll be gone or drooling soon.”
Your nasty little post 23 is about age (demographics) and my post 29 is correcting you about age (demographics).
The chart in 29 goes with the paragraph above it and the link that I supplied, the Beatles are famous for covering a huge demographic by age which you didn’t know.
It has everything to do with my conversation, it is you that keeps trying to get off track.
>>The chart in 29 goes with the paragraph above it and the link that I supplied, the Beatles are famous for covering a huge demographic by age which you didn’t know.<<
Seriously, you need not to take things so personally. That’s what you accused me of. When one is conversing, one needs to look at both sides of the conversation. You responded to Post 4. It really wasn’t to you, but you chose to do it. So, I responded from my pings and wasn’t in on your conversations with others. You opened up a reply to me. Our conversation really didn’t include what you were writing to others.
Did you see that I’m a boomer too? I’ll be gone or drooling soon myself. All of us die. You can find many a Frank Sinatra fan nowadays. They don’t influence society. Soon enough, there won’t be the huge amount of people who think that the Beatles are the end all be all of society. That happens with everyone.
There may be fans of a group. However, history sees them in a different light.