Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pissant
Wow.

Mark Steyn just publicly slapped down his editors at National Review.

Here's a quote from an unsigned 28 July 2009 editorial at National Review Online that essentially claims there is no “Long Form” birth certificate to release:

“The fundamental fiction is that Obama has refused to release his “real” birth certificate. This is untrue. The document that Obama has made available is the document that Hawaiian authorities issue when they are asked for a birth certificate. There is no secondary document cloaked in darkness, only the state records that are used to generate birth certificates when they are requested.”

Then here's Mark Steyn on 30 July 2009:

“But do I think there's something on the long-form birth certificate he doesn't want us to see? Yes. That would seem entirely likely — and consistent with [Obama’s] modus operandi.”

Perhaps there is still hope for saving National Review from the Centrists and the Neo-Cons.

26 posted on 07/30/2009 4:29:11 PM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: zeestephen

The morons who wrote that piece are so full of crap, I can smell them here on the West Coast.

I had to respond strongly.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2303121/posts


34 posted on 07/30/2009 4:34:44 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson