Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

1,216,200 MILLION OF YOUR MONEY FOR MICHELLE OBAMA'S LACKEY'S
Red South

Posted on 07/30/2009 9:37:00 AM PDT by RED SOUTH

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: napscoordinator

this woman is in the black house because her husband is a counterfeit thug who has bloody hands and bloody relationships. SHE DOES not deserve to be there any more than he does or her mother!!! And I resent one dollar of my taxes going to perpetrate this CRIME.

And I do take a pill each day, it’s called a “Reality” Pill.


41 posted on 07/30/2009 10:25:37 AM PDT by bareford101 (the obamanation is a COUNTERFEIT with a COUNTERFEIT birth cert. & 39 different ss cards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: RED SOUTH

Michelle for new “Queen of Mean.” Only little people don’t have staffs.


42 posted on 07/30/2009 10:29:50 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RED SOUTH

Remember this is annually. So you’re looking at over $10 million easily. And, this doesn’t included all the not-on-this-list, all the other not includeds like what we may be paying to ferry these people around with her majesty. So, wouldn’t be surprising to learn it’s costing $15-$20 million over 4 years.


43 posted on 07/30/2009 10:32:18 AM PDT by visualops (portraits.artlife.us or visit my freeper page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bareford101

The reason I said take a pill is because you were sounding like the DU’ers during President Bush’s eight years.


44 posted on 07/30/2009 10:33:24 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
What promulgation would that be?

I made a graph of the numbers asserted in the article and I presented it without comment.

Think of it as a public service to the thread: depicting the asserted numbers in a visual form.

For homework: your task is to regraph the numbers with the fresh data from this thread. That would be more useful than whining about other people's visual aides.

45 posted on 07/30/2009 10:40:34 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: musicman

Excellent catch!


46 posted on 07/30/2009 10:42:06 AM PDT by NorwegianViking (Organizing for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: wac3rd

In 2007, Laura Bush had the following:

McBride, Anita B. Assistant to the president and chief of staff to the first lady $168,000

Harder, Cherie S. Special asistant to the president for domestic policy and director of project of the first lady $108,000.00

Niemiec, Sally M. Press secretary to the First Lady $90,000.00

Miller, Sonja M. Deputy chief of staff to the first lady $84,700.00

Ballard, Deanna M. Director of scheduling for the First Lady $75,000.00

Underwood, Carrie P. Deputy director of policy and projects for the First Lady $65,000.00

Wallace, Charity N. Director of advance for the First Lady $65,000.00

Marshall, Misty C. Director of correspondence for the first lady $59,700.00

Etter, Marisa L. Deputy director of scheduling for the First Lady $50,000.00

King, Kristin N. Deputy director of advance for the first lady $50,000.00

Lineweaver, Lindsey M. Special assistant and personal aide to the first lady $47,500.00

Rawson, Kimberly D. Executive assistant to the chief of staff to the First Lady $46,200.00

Donoghue , Tarah C. Deputy press secretary to the First Lady $43,000.00

Vogel, Campbell B. Deputy director of correspondence for the First Lady $42,500.00

Block, Jonathan F. Assistant press secretary to the First Lady $39,000.00

Total of $1,033,600

http://www.nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2007/whsalaries.htm


47 posted on 07/30/2009 10:48:27 AM PDT by AtlMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LADY J

It tells you right in the article:
_______

Um, there was no article. It was Red South’s vanity post.

Laura Bush’s staff cost her 1.19 million dollars a year.


48 posted on 07/30/2009 11:04:10 AM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RED SOUTH

She needs this just to look decent


49 posted on 07/30/2009 11:20:10 AM PDT by crazyotto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RED SOUTH
why the lie?

Why say that Laura only had one staffer?

Did YOU assume that we were so stupid that we wouldn’t know an obvious lie when we saw it?

Did YOU think that an appeal to emotionalism based upon a lie trumps the truth?

Why lie?

50 posted on 07/30/2009 12:18:39 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be redistributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LADY J
It tells you right in the article:

Except the "article" lied about it.

51 posted on 07/30/2009 12:25:06 PM PDT by saquin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

And you realize your little chart is false, right?


52 posted on 07/30/2009 12:26:04 PM PDT by saquin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: bareford101
this woman is in the black house

It's called the "White House".

53 posted on 07/30/2009 12:28:04 PM PDT by saquin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: saquin

i apologize. that was petty of me.


54 posted on 07/30/2009 12:41:11 PM PDT by bareford101 (the obamanation is a COUNTERFEIT with a COUNTERFEIT birth cert. & 39 different ss cards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: saquin
It's called the "White House".

Source?

55 posted on 07/30/2009 9:55:03 PM PDT by Libloather (Tea Totaler, PROUD Birther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: saquin
Except the "article" lied about it.

Source?

56 posted on 07/30/2009 9:55:59 PM PDT by Libloather (Tea Totaler, PROUD Birther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
White House

You owe me some answers now. It's your turn...

57 posted on 07/30/2009 10:02:53 PM PDT by saquin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Except the "article" lied about it.

Source?

Article

: "One wonders why she needs so much help, at taxpayer expense, when even Hillary, only had three; Jackie Kennedy one; Laura Bush one..."

National Journal:

Let's play "count the first lady's staff". Hint: It's more than "one".

See, some of us don't find it very difficult to verify our assertions here. I'm curious why you do?

58 posted on 07/30/2009 10:08:42 PM PDT by saquin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: saquin
See, some of us don't find it very difficult to verify our assertions here.

But you didn't do that up front. Why?

59 posted on 07/30/2009 10:11:02 PM PDT by Libloather (Tea Totaler, PROUD Birther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Most of them are pretty obvious. (You needed a “source” to back up my claim that the White House is actually called the “White House”?) But, I will gladly back up claims when asked. Why won’t you and why did you get so defensive about it?


60 posted on 07/30/2009 10:13:15 PM PDT by saquin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson