>>Well, if the government gets to define disorderly then it can define ANY speech against the government as disorderly or causing disorder. So much for the first.<<
No it can not. Conduct is conduct. Speech is speech, and protected by the constitution.
That is why I cannot shoot people and call it “political speech”.
” Conduct is conduct. Speech is speech,”
Um, conduct includes speech.
” Conduct is conduct. Speech is speech,”
Um, conduct includes speech.