Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Army caught up in reservist’s Obama conspiracy theory
Stars and Stripes ^ | July 30, 2009 | By Megan McCloskey

Posted on 07/29/2009 9:31:48 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-187 last
To: Prodigal Son
Prodigal Son said: "I mean, we need to think seriously about what the ramifications of this are. "

Indeed we must.

You state, "the military has to be held to a different standard".

That standard is, and always has been, the Constitution of the United States. The Courts have made clear that no part of the Constitution may be found to have no effect. Our Founders included various things because our Founders decided that such things were sufficiently important to include.

Our military has no duty whatever to obey the orders of a "Commander-in-Chief" who is not eligible to hold that office. The reason for the eligibility requirement is to protect the interests of the people of the United States. That interest is further protected by the military refusing to follow the orders of anyone ineligible to command.

The lack of an "official definition" does not reduce the applicability of the eligibility requirement. The Courts have the power to clarify the meaning of the requirement and will do so when presented with a case. The only way to get the case is for those who are unconvinced to challenge their orders.

Those military who sincerely doubt Obama's eligibility are duty bound to challenge his orders. Our military should not have been put into the position of having doubts.

181 posted on 07/30/2009 10:54:39 AM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: 70times7
70times7 said: "NJP will be administered swiftly to anyone who attempts to use this as a means to disobey a normal order. "

NJP [Non-Judicial Punishment] is punishment which a soldier accepts rather than demand a court-martial. There is no requirement to accept such punishment. One might question why Cook was not court-martialed for refusing a lawful order.

George Washington was compelled to punish recruits who attempted to leave service prior to the end of their enlistments. The fact that they volunteered for such enlistments in no way protected them from such punishment.

Similarly, though Cook volunteered for service, once he was issued ORDERS, he was required by military law to obey them if they were lawful.

182 posted on 07/30/2009 11:04:11 AM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: danamco

Cheney was correct about the electoral votes. You know darn well what I’m talking about. The rats failed to vet Obama, and then they threatened riots if he didn’t win, let alone wasn’t qualified. Trying to foist the blame to Cheney?


183 posted on 07/30/2009 1:23:59 PM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (Ayers unimportant? What about Robert KKK Byrd or FALN pardons? DNC -- the terrorism party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

“The momentum should not be lost but the thrust now should be to portray Barack Obama not as a counterfeit Natural Born Citizen but as a mountebank with a shadowy history which he refuses to illuminate by releasing records of his birth, his passports, his transcripts, his employment and practice.”

In other words, we should stick with the truth? You’re on the right track. There’s no need to get caught up in the speculation trap. The facts are damning enough.


184 posted on 07/30/2009 1:26:59 PM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (Ayers unimportant? What about Robert KKK Byrd or FALN pardons? DNC -- the terrorism party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Stars and Stripes spin. Wow did it go left.


185 posted on 07/30/2009 1:34:15 PM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
No we are treading in the territory of the mine field!!!

How about the 50 SoS, or the electoral college???

186 posted on 07/30/2009 6:20:13 PM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: William Tell
once [Cook] was issued orders, he was required by military law to obey them IF THEY WERE LAWFUL.

Yeah, so?

187 posted on 07/30/2009 7:13:06 PM PDT by 70times7 (What is Obama's hurry? Is he anxious to get to his cigarette? America wants some foreplay first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-187 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson