I'm not sure. IF we had hardcore Constitutional evidence that he was not eligible to be President, then I don't see how the SCOTUS could refuse to hear the case (it probably could be directly submitted to them without having to go through the lower courts first). I remember that the last thing in the universe they wanted to do was get involved with Bush v. Gore, but they felt they HAD to because of the importance of the subject. I would think this would be on the same level, but who knows? :)
And does anyone think Congress will impeach? HA!
I thought about that too, but came to an interesting problem. In this case they could only impeach "the President", and our whole case would be that he is NOT the President. LOL!
I thought about that too, but came to an interesting problem. In this case they could only impeach "the President", and our whole case would be that he is NOT the President. LOL!
ROTFLOLOL! That's hilarious. That line is so good it will probably be swiped and end up on Letterman.
Happy to see you posting, FK. You've been missed.