The earth is a complex system. Hell, we can't even get a 3 day forecast correct. Your “chemistry” might be correct under tightly controlled lab systems. But I more likely suspect some statistics were involved because you can't get the tightly controlled conditions.
All evidence I have seen shows co2 is a lagging indicator of warming, not a cause. Matches with with what I learned in chemistry, increasing temp increases respiration and other chemical reactions.
C02 is NOT a pollutant, it is part of a necessary system and is a political misdirection that you have bought into. Study your Botany, For many plants low C02 is a limiting growth factor. In fact, there is a secondary process requiring more plant energy to capture C02 under the current low co2 concentrations. There are many self correcting systems in place and I will trust God before I will trust man or Govt.
To add more to this there is evidence we may be experiencing global coollng rather that warming. So the basic premise of this whole thing is most likely be wrong. You remind me of the grad student who tells me there is NO statistical correction but then goes on to show me charts of cause and effect and give me recommendations of action. Do you really believe the left is about a reasonable energy policy? Are you that foolish? I suggest you are the one being used.
The blind faith with which people follow the left agenda as propagandized by media is scarey.
As usual, "Follow the money(and power)" is the rule.
Al Gore, Pelosi, and other global warming/carbon/alternative fuels investors are laughing all the way to the bank.
I read that Gore is now worth 100 mil; when he left office, that was a couple of mil. Not a bad return for 8 or 9 years--all made touting smaller carbon footprints while he made some of the biggest footprints ever.
vaudine
Given the fact that I totally agree with you on this than what is the point of contention? None I think.