Skip to comments.
Electromagnetic attack: Thinking the unthinkable
The Heritage Foundation ^
| July 28, 2009
| James Jay Carafano
Posted on 07/28/2009 9:56:15 PM PDT by ChocChipCookie
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
To: ChocChipCookie
Part of the problem is that the SocialDemocrats, who are overwhelmingly in control, believe that no one would attack a truly “Progressive” country which they think the US is becoming under Social Democrat rule and at the same time they believe that the US “deserves” whatever mayhem that aggrieved whoevers might inflict on the US. They also are firmly wedded to the mindset that defense against physical violence is the most heinous crime. They rip open the collective American shirt and bare the American chest, crying out “shoot me, if you must!” believing that the righteous enemies of America will be moved by the spectacle of desperate confession of sins and relent.
21
posted on
07/29/2009 2:30:00 AM PDT
by
arthurus
("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
To: ReadTheLaw
ANY diet if stuck too will help you loose weight....Somalia might be the more apt comparison.
22
posted on
07/29/2009 2:32:39 AM PDT
by
arthurus
("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
To: AZLiberty
i.e. a mega Faraday cage.
23
posted on
07/29/2009 2:34:04 AM PDT
by
arthurus
("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
To: ReadTheLaw
24
posted on
07/29/2009 2:53:31 AM PDT
by
backhoe
(All across America, the Lights are going out...)
To: Salamander
25
posted on
07/29/2009 4:26:42 AM PDT
by
erman
(Outside of a dog, a book is man's best companion. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.)
To: backhoe
Interesting, thanks for the link.
26
posted on
07/29/2009 5:37:32 AM PDT
by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: OneWingedShark
27
posted on
07/29/2009 6:43:56 AM PDT
by
backhoe
(All across America, the Lights are going out...)
To: Secret Agent Man
What worries me that IF something like this happened, anyone with a running vehicle would immediately become the target of swarms of desperate, armed people.
28
posted on
07/29/2009 7:26:47 AM PDT
by
ChocChipCookie
(Survival is a Mom's Job! Check out my blog: www.thesurvivalmom.com)
To: ChocChipCookie
What are the “significant challenges” in pulling off such an attack?
29
posted on
07/29/2009 8:00:36 AM PDT
by
uscabjd
To: arthurus
I'm getting into my survivalist mode, and one of the things I bought was a small transistor radio, AM/FM/SW.
I made a Farady Cage for it that cost about 11 cents: I wrapped it in aluminum foil, and grounded it to a water pipe in my garage.
I'm sorry for not stimulating the economy!
To: uscabjd
I didn’t make any comments about “significant challenges.”
31
posted on
07/29/2009 8:11:28 AM PDT
by
ChocChipCookie
(Survival is a Mom's Job! Check out my blog: www.thesurvivalmom.com)
To: ChocChipCookie
The article made reference to the challenges such an attack would pose, as a reason some discount the possibility of a EMP attack. I don’t know what they are - just wondered if someone did.
32
posted on
07/29/2009 8:15:05 AM PDT
by
uscabjd
To: ChocChipCookie
Both the departments of Defense and Homeland Security place dealing with the threat of catastrophic attack high on their lists of what keeps them up at night. Yet, Homeland Security doesn't include an EMP as one of their disaster-planning scenarios.If Iran does an EMP attack on the US, millions of Americans will die.
And Janet Napolitano will go down in history as the biggest idiot of all time.
33
posted on
07/29/2009 8:16:43 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
To: ChocChipCookie
As for the Pentagon, Gates just cut 10 percent of the missile-defense budget--the best weapons we have to prevent EMP attacks. Congress is equally in la-la land. Having commissioned the EMP report and accepted its findings, last week the Senate joined the House in rubber-stamping Gates' missile-defense cuts. Guess there's no lobbyist lining the pockets of our congresscritters on this one...
34
posted on
07/29/2009 8:18:40 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
To: ChocChipCookie
“But the truth is a large-scale one would be an instrument of genocide. “
The stated EMP affects is neither truth nor genocide. It MAY have some limited abilty to affect some long wire devices and systems, but this idea that anything and everything electronic would fail and we would all die is nothing but ignorance and drama queen antics.
35
posted on
07/29/2009 8:21:12 AM PDT
by
CodeToad
(If it weren't for physics and law enforcement I'd be unstoppable!)
To: uscabjd
I read Newt’s original article on the subject a couple of months ago, and I believe he mentioned it would “only” take 2 or 3 nuclear warheads exploding hundreds of miles above the U.S. to have these devastating consequences. Maybe the powers that be think it would be a significant challenge for our enemies to come up with that, but I don’t see why.
36
posted on
07/29/2009 8:22:02 AM PDT
by
ChocChipCookie
(Survival is a Mom's Job! Check out my blog: www.thesurvivalmom.com)
To: ArmyTeach
Check out the book One Second After by William R. Forstchen.
Great book - both interesting and seriously depressing.
37
posted on
07/29/2009 8:23:59 AM PDT
by
weef
To: GOPJ
And Janet Napolitano will go down in history as the biggest idiot of all time.
The biggest idiot, huh? Man, there's some stiff competition for that title. LOL
38
posted on
07/29/2009 8:24:53 AM PDT
by
ChocChipCookie
(Survival is a Mom's Job! Check out my blog: www.thesurvivalmom.com)
To: Secret Agent Man
so my ‘89 wrangler might work? sweet. put the top down and cruise in the traffic free streets of NYC. shotgun in hand, of course.
39
posted on
07/29/2009 8:32:40 AM PDT
by
thefactor
(yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
To: Secret Agent Man
Ironically, NASCAR calls their current generation of “stock” race cars “Cars of Tomorrow”. They have carburetors, pushrod valves, and all the high technology of the 50s. Maybe “cars of yesterday” are what we ought to be buying.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson