I read your posts last night where you were putting this together.
This is the most plausible scenerio that I have read to date. It makes perfect sense.
The only thing that doesn’t make sense is the BC numbering. If the factcheck BC is the one that was indeed ordered in 2007 (see previous poster’s work on determining this date), why would the numbers be so close to the twin’s BC numbers? The only explanation is that the department reserved ranges of BC numbers for date periods in the event that there were amended or late registrations.
Thoughts?
That was my thought exactly. It would seem a logical thing to reserve numbers for just such situations.
But remember that the COLB purported to be Obama's has never been verified as authentic by anyone in Hawaii. They are always careful in the statements to say that the documents they have on file are authentic. If the COLB floating around online is a forgery than it's likely they used an unused number or the number of someone else so the sequence would be close to when he said he was born.