I was shooting for 8 or 9 on structure and readability but it was very late and I was in a rush.
As far as content and plausibility I tried to come up with a scenario that would fit facts and the actions taken by those involved...especially the statements by Fukino.
Don't you find it odd that Fukino would make ANY statement if it were so cut and dried as we're being led to believe? The reason, anti-birthers say, is to put to rest the rumors that Obama isn't qualified to be President. Yet every time she has made a statement it leads to even more questions. A clear cut statement such as "The COLB first posted on factcheck.org appears identical to the COLB on file for Barak Obama." Obama could authorize her to make such as statement. Yet she always vouches for what's ON FILE. NOT what Obama has released.
Maybe she’s never seen the one on Factcheck (2/10 for plausibility). Or she has extremely anal lawyers on staff telling her which words to use (5/10).