This theory has to work around the birth announcement in the paper. As far as we all know, there was a birth announcement in the paper. Whether or not the info in the announcement was legit (lots of questions about the address listed), there was still something in the paper about the Messiah in 1961. Still, all interesting stuff. And, thanks again to Dobbs for taking this mainstream. This was all underground until he started talking about it.
See post 25...How hard would it be to find a left leaning sympathetic journalist to alter microfilm in Hawaii?
If she applied for a late birth certificate say a couple of days after arriving in Hawaii in early July 1961 for the Messiah, the notice in the newspaper could have been one of those standard things that was done in applying for the late BC, check Box “A” to have a short notice placed of baby’s birth in the local paper type of thing. Might have taken no effort at all and was probably a pretty standard thing.
There could be a second record if there was a legal adoption. That would not affect the original newspaper birth announcement