“The new certificate of birth shall show the true or probable foreign country of birth, and that the certificate is not evidence of United States citizenship for the child for whom it is issued or for the adoptive parents. [L 1979, c 203, §3; am L 1990, c 338, §3]”
Wow! You may be on to something here. It makes perfect sense. Could this be why Obama does not have a normal long form BC?
The plot thickens.
On one of the earlier threads today there was a discussion on why Obama’s number was after and why he had a zero in front of his number. The top two are the twins’ number botton is BOs.
10637
10638
010641
Are we misreading it? Could the zero in front of BO’s actually be a the letter “O”. (For Original)? Then altered once be listed as A10641 or B10641 as court ordered changes took place. Do we know ANYONE In HI that know how the notation is arrived at or changed for legal purposes?