Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MHGinTN; binary; tc45a
It is most likely a sequence of health department form processing.

Please see post 262 and 263.

If it was based upon when the form was received (i.e., accepted/filed) by the Registrar, then Obama's number should STILL be lower, NOT higher, than the twin's birth certificate numbers.

264 posted on 07/29/2009 10:04:00 AM PDT by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies ]


To: BP2
If it was based upon when the form was received (i.e., accepted/filed) by the Registrar, then Obama's number should STILL be lower, NOT higher, than the twin's birth certificate numbers.

There could have been multiple people processing these forms at the Registers office. Some may have worked faster than others. There could be many legitimate reasons the dates and numbers don't match. I don't think the registers office put the forms in order based upon date and birth hour-they could probably have cared less. All they wanted was to get them registered.

I want more info before making a decision.

268 posted on 07/29/2009 10:22:06 AM PDT by tc45a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies ]

To: BP2; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; MeekOneGOP; ...
If it was based upon when the form was received (i.e., accepted/filed) by the Registrar, then Obama’s number should STILL be lower, NOT higher, than the twin’s birth certificate numbers.

Ping to posts 262-264.

269 posted on 07/29/2009 10:36:16 AM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson