Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NTSB: Planes at increasing risk from large birds
AP on Yahoo ^ | 7/28/09 | Joan Lowy - ap

Posted on 07/28/2009 1:07:58 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON – Aircraft design standards aren't tough enough for planes to withstand collisions with growing numbers of large birds, safety investigators examining an Oklahoma crash that killed five men said Tuesday.

The Federal Aviation Administration requires the bodies of commercial aircraft to withstand a collision with a bird weighing 4 pounds or 8 pounds depending upon the section of the plane — standards that haven't been updated since the 1970s, investigators told the National Transportation Safety Board.

An FAA advisory committee spent 10 years examining whether the standards should be updated and then disbanded without reaching a conclusion, investigators said.

"I think that ridiculous," NTSB chairman Debbie Hersman said. "That's a tremendous waste of time and expertise." She said the agency needs to be "publishing rules and getting on with what's feasible."

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: airlinesafety; birds; birdstrikes; ntsb; planecrash; planes; risk

1 posted on 07/28/2009 1:07:58 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Watch out for the ‘Plumpers’!


2 posted on 07/28/2009 1:11:28 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
An FAA advisory committee spent 10 years examining whether the standards should be updated and then disbanded without reaching a conclusion, investigators said.

NTSB chairman Debbie Hersman said. "That's a tremendous waste of time and expertise."

How about all of the wasted taxpayer dollars.

Where is the accountability?

I would assume that an advisory committee must have at least 3 members. And an expert would expect to draw at least $70K per year. So that is 2.1 million dollars minimum down the rabbit hole.

If they did not come up with a recommendation in the first year they should have been canned.

3 posted on 07/28/2009 1:20:19 PM PDT by Pontiac (Your message here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Paint really mean looking hawk faces on the nose of airliners, with external loud speakers that make screeching hawk like sounds.


4 posted on 07/28/2009 1:25:02 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Almost grasping the obvious.


5 posted on 07/28/2009 1:35:00 PM PDT by Steamburg ( Your wallet speaks the only language most politicians understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

New wave of obesity strikes bird population, FedGov handouts blamed

or

Windmills fail to control bird population: Bird strike deaths to soar.

Maybe I can get a job wrting headlines at the World News Daily.....


6 posted on 07/28/2009 1:37:27 PM PDT by ASOC (Cave quid dicis, quando, et cui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

So the rules for bird strikes haven’t been upgraded since the 70s.... so? Have birds somehow become more obese in the last 30 years?

Nope.. we just aren’t allowed to kill nuisance geese now like we were back then.

How the “canadian goose” aka crapulus maximus became a protected species is beyond me.


7 posted on 07/28/2009 1:40:14 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The Envirowackos want it this way. Don’t move the geese. You might upset them.


8 posted on 07/28/2009 1:43:23 PM PDT by RoadTest (I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. - John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
growing numbers of large birds

Why do I think this is an indirect reference to the ever-increasing out-of-control population of "Canadian" geese in the Northeast?

9 posted on 07/28/2009 1:47:52 PM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Oversized honkers are bad for the public health.
10 posted on 07/28/2009 1:48:07 PM PDT by madinmadtown (Nuclear...better to mispronounce it, than not understand it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

11 posted on 07/28/2009 2:30:59 PM PDT by Bean Counter ( Shovel ready...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson