Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SaveTheChief

You are missing the point. The USG sets the reporting parameters and defines how the data is reported so they can compile it nationally. I would assume that Hawaii would adhere to those standards. Today, it may be African, which is why I posited that the recently issued COLBs [secondary documents] use the term African.


56 posted on 07/28/2009 11:23:45 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: kabar
You are missing the point. The USG sets the reporting parameters and defines how the data is reported so they can compile it nationally.

The obvious point you seem to be missing is that the USG gives parameters on how to report the race of the child. It doesn't tell parents what they can and cannot put down on the birth certificate. They can classify themselves however they want. If you don't like any of the race categories listed, you can just check "other" and fill in what you want to call yourself.

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdf

Duh. I can't believe how stupid the birther arguments have become.

136 posted on 07/28/2009 1:08:53 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: kabar
In the late 60’s my grandmother worked at Sears in HR. She had to fill out a federal form that listed the races of all employees. The designation was COIN. Caucasian, Oriental, Indian (American) and Negro. If that helps.
140 posted on 07/28/2009 1:15:21 PM PDT by carton253 (Ask me about Throw Away the Scabbard - a Civil War alternate history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson