Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Danae

A good theory. I have speculated a different ‘embarrassing’ reason Obama would want to keep the details of his birth a secret. The whole timeline just points to concealing Stanley Ann during her pregnancy. There’s no record of her whereabouts from January 61 until August 61—when she would have been showing. That’s what began to make me wonder about his actual parentage. I mean, he could be an illegitimate child from an affair Stanley had with some woman of color. It seems so odd to me that Stanley Ann was so willing to leave the baby (and her alleged husband) in Hawaii 3 weeks after he was born to head back up to Washington to school. It also explains the lack of a marriage record, because they were never really married—it was only a cover story—maybe they paid BHO Sr to go along. It would explain the ‘fake’ Hawaii address for the newspaper announcement because that could have been faked by Grandma Toot. It would explain why Grandma and Grandpa ‘raised’ him, except for the four years in Indonesia with his ‘sister (?)’ It would explain why Obama Sr. never had any interest in BHO—because he wasn’t really his. That would explain the physical similarities to Stanley. It would explain why Obama doesn’t want to release the original birth records because it would show adoption records, name changes, etc. Perhaps this whole thing was concocted to cover up an affair Stanley Dunham had where he impregnated some young black girl. It would explain why, as a teenager, after he found his birth certificate, he went began to rebel, do drugs, etc. It would explain why he was so interested in getting Grandma Toot’s ashes tossed into the sea (now, no one could verify he had no DNA connection to her) and would also explain the photos on the internet of Michelle leaping into Obama’s arms with joy after the scattering of the ashes ceremony in Hawaii. Don’t you think this storyline would explain Obama’s secrecy, outside of a “born in Africa” scenario?

Flame away...


24 posted on 07/27/2009 11:38:33 AM PDT by erkyl (We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office --Aesop (~550 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: erkyl

Now that is an interesting theory. I thought it (the long form BC) might show that his father wasn’t who we were told but maybe Frank Marshall or Malcolm X or whoever but your theory is pretty interesting.


29 posted on 07/27/2009 11:43:31 AM PDT by Jaxter (Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: erkyl

Maybe. I can’t say either way. All I know is that the simplest answer is usually the correct one, Occam’s razor and what not. But even saying that, your theory could be close to the truth.


34 posted on 07/27/2009 11:49:08 AM PDT by Danae (I AM JIM THOMPSON - Conservative does not equal Republican. Conservative does not compromise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: erkyl

As I have been thinking about this, something occurs to me... all the nudie shots of Ann Duhnam in the possession of Frank Marshal. It does not seem logical to me that he would get those pictures on some sort of a fluke, particularly if they were taken in his house... be that as it may, I think Ann was perhaps attracted to black men, certainly she was not at all repulsed, and why should she be? Personality and other personal characteristics are a lot more important to me than skin color, but then I grew up in Hawaii as a white Haole and so I look at race issues from a different perspective than some. Certainly I have a different one than Stanley Ann Dunham’s mom did.


55 posted on 07/27/2009 12:07:36 PM PDT by Danae (I AM JIM THOMPSON - Conservative does not equal Republican. Conservative does not compromise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: erkyl
Not a "flame", but I DO have a question: How can an affair between two women produce a child?

I mean, he could be an illegitimate child from an affair Stanley had with some woman of color.

63 posted on 07/27/2009 12:21:59 PM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: erkyl
It would explain why he was so interested in getting Grandma Toot’s ashes tossed into the sea (now, no one could verify he had no DNA connection to her) and would also explain the photos on the internet of Michelle leaping into Obama’s arms with joy after the scattering of the ashes ceremony in Hawaii.

Interesting theory -- except this: Are you referring to the photos in the link below? They show his sister hugging him after the scattering of the ashes, but not "leaping into his arms with joy"; and Michelle is nowhere in evidence.

The emotional moment Barack Obama scattered his grandmother's ashes

70 posted on 07/27/2009 12:35:21 PM PDT by Albion Wilde ("Media: quit making things up." --Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: erkyl

That’s a new one.


76 posted on 07/27/2009 12:39:50 PM PDT by fanfan (Why did they bury Barry's past?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson