Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: theFIRMbss
Even the liberal LA Times on June 30, 2009 in an article dripping with contempt--conceded that the thing Obama's people posted online was "technically... not a birth certificate".

A bill in the US congress with 10 backers currently -- calls for future presidential candidates to be required to show a birth certificate.

The library of congress has recently started including the Obama File in its historic collections of Internet materials related to the Presidential Transition during a Time of Crises. The Obama File holds that Obama's birth certificate as presented online is bogus.

Now this story is starting to change. Some liberals in an open acknowledgement of Obama's problems are starting to call for a change in the constitution.Liberal defenders of Obama in full retreat on Birth CertificateNow The LA Times Wants To Amend the Constitution Rather Than Have Obama Show His Birth Certificate. (Translation: Yeah he’s not a Natural Born Citizen — As the Constitution Requires.)
111 posted on 07/27/2009 12:38:09 PM PDT by ckilmer (Phi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: ckilmer
> calls for future presidential candidates to be required to show a birth certificate

He has a passport.
He must have shown them his real
birth certificate.

Isn't the only
issue here if one parent
qualifies the guy

as a citizen
enough to be president?
If it comes to that

isn't that issue
just a judge's decision?
Let's take it as read.



129 posted on 07/27/2009 1:04:16 PM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson