Posted on 07/27/2009 10:45:58 AM PDT by EveningStar
LLS
Charles has had a liberlectamy just as huffington has.
LLS
LLS
Nirthers?
Now we're nirhters?
Where's the birth certificate?
"There is no question about that at all. His mother was a citizen when he was born, so he is a citizen."
You see I would argue that without seeing Obama's genuine (to which a forged COLB need not apply) birth certificate....we really have no solid proof that Stanley was Obama's birth mother. She just shows up with him out of the blue as a much older infant. There are no records of her with him as a tiny baby. That she is his biological mother might be inferred through resemblance, etc. but 'family resemblance' would never satisify security checks or passport office, or genealogical societies.
In other words what I'm saying is: Without that certified proved genuine long form birth certificate we really don't know squat, citizen or otherwise. All we really have is Obama's word on it. And its been proven over and over that his word isn't worth much.
There were those accounts of the manger and strange star appearances. :->
Trying to make himself look better, perhaps he told some whoppers in the book that would actually hurt him (like indicating that he's not natural born), and now he can't get out of his tangled web. He's just an cypher.
Oh heck, toots, there was a night Chuckles banned people that weren’t even on-line at the time. I’m sure all you did was express an opinion that wasn’t lock-step with Sharmuta or Kilgore Trout.
I appreciate your sharing that with me... I love shooting zombies! ;-)
LLS
Ann can’t even get this right...no one is questioning Obama’s citizenship. Whether he is eligible under the Constitution based on his birthed citizenship (if he is a naturalized citizen as the Constitution requires) is questioned.
Who was that black kid saying “Republicans are focusing on ‘minor issues’? I’m sorry, but protecting the integrity of the Constitution is no minor issue.
Dreadful.
If we listed all the better Conservative talk show hosts . . .
and had to guess . . . which one or two MIGHT just be a globalist double agent plant . . .
I wonder who the two most likely candidates would be.
Well, I’m crumbling like cotton candy in a rainstorm here before all your arguments.
I give! Yeah, we need to see the documentation.
When I think about it, it’s easy to think his whole life is one big lie, just like everything else he says.
They are a mythological figure like a unicorn or the Loch Ness Monster. (That is, if you just go by every single standard/definition required by some.)
I read a review that put all sorts of socio-political-blah blah into it.
It's Fiction. The Zombies are the bad guys. The good guys (after they get their #$#@!$ together) take them out. There's some interestingly commentary on evil capitalists and incompetent bureaucrats and yadda yadda yadda. But it's easy to skim those parts. :-)
Like I said...it doesn't bog you down with a lot of details.
While driving around on Sunday, I heard a John Gibson radio show repeat on the XM Fox News Channel. He was talking about the Birth Certificate and was practically hysterical whenever a “birther” tried to talk to him. Called them liars and wouldn’t listen to a thing anyone was saying.
Red Eye on FNC did the same thing Friday night. Had this moron on who was not only dismissing it but was spouting garbage like “they don’t like to release Birth Certificates, because they can get the social security numbers off them.” I’ll assume he meant that you can obtain a social security number with them because SSN’s are not ON birth certificates.
Hmmmm. Interesting point.
All my speculation has been based around his father.....wonder what would happen if she wasn't his mother? Kidnapped (or bought+sold) at birth, or something.
That's some REAL tinfoil hat stuff, but it would make sense as to why he wants the BC covered up.
Then you should already know that Charles has lost it. What he says about "birthers" carries as much weight as what he says about anything else.
I disagree.
If they released said documents, the Whine House would have a new occupant.
It would be pretty stupid to give up all that power, especially if you might be able to use the full force and weight of the US government to illegally retain it...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.