I have disdain for the Democratic Party as it is comprised today. So I certainly am not part of this majority that you speak of.
What is your types position on homosexuality and the military
Being a minarchist, I personally do not care about the sexual orientation of individuals. I do however have problems with homosexual couples wanting to have recognized marriages. If marriage is allowed to be redefined, then any kind of union would and should get equal protection. The real problem is the Social Security survivor benefits that spouses can receive when the other spouse passes away. I can envision all sorts of 'marriages' taking place simply as a means to gain access to these survivor benefits. But, if the benefits did not exist, I'd have no dog in that hunt.
As to the military [and I'm assuming that you didn't specifically mean homosexuality in the military], I am a 10-year active duty veteran of the United States Marine Corps and was a Staff Non-Commissioned Officer. The military (at least the Corps) is great; it's the never-ending foreign policy-induced entanglements that the U.S. gets herself into that has me distressed. Don't take that the wrong way; Afghanistan needed the Taliban removed and Iraq was non-compliant with 1991 cease-fire agreements. It's playing soft with N. Korea [making a deal with them during the Clinton years]; the Bush apology to the Chinese when they downed our spy plane over international waters in April of '2001; appeasing the Saudis for recent presence even though our presence in '90-'91 kept Saddam from marching his troop southward; negotiating with Isreal's terrost-state neighbors for some half-assed peace accord that its insatiable radical neighbors want; eceterra.
I meant full open homosexuality in the military not whether you like the military or if your types approve or disapprove of homosexuality.