To: ansel12
So you do want the federal government to restrict and limit homosexuals and their practices in the military? I think that the "don't ask, don't tell" policy works effectively. I do not think that homosexual service members should be allowed to serve with their sexual preferences revealed; I believe that that should be grounds for being discharged from duty. I do not believe, however, that homosexual service members should be targeted for investigation just because someone else suspects that they may be gay or lesbian - perhaps by a seemingly hostile anti-homosexual crusader such as yourself. If I mischarachterize you, please set the record 'straight' for me: your language ["your types"] leads me to believe that you have some fairly strong and intolerant views on this topic.
104 posted on
07/26/2009 11:38:48 AM PDT by
LowCountryJoe
(Do class-warfare and disdain of laissez-faire have their places in today's GOP?)
To: LowCountryJoe
Was that a yes to this question?
So you do want the federal government to restrict and limit homosexuals and their practices in the military?
That 8% gay military?
105 posted on
07/26/2009 12:11:27 PM PDT by
ansel12
(Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
To: LowCountryJoe
I guess we have to assume that you want to use federal power to go toward blocking homosexual freedoms in the military to protect the military from the damage that the gay culture would bring to it and it’s “8% Gay” members.
108 posted on
07/26/2009 12:34:56 PM PDT by
ansel12
(Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson