Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jazusamo
A Gatesgate At Henry Gates' "Bogus" Charity?

Henry Louis Gates, Jr controls a tax-exempt, non-profit charity, Inkwell Foundation, Inc, that managed to raise hundreds of thousands of dollars in direct support in one year, yet only gave out $27,500 in grants, the bulk of which went to Gates' employees and Harvard colleagues.

Also, as recently as September 2008, the Boston Globe reported that Gates' charity was not in compliance with the law for failing to register the proper paperwork, despite the charity existing since 2005. The charge at the time was that it was "bogus," as you'll see below. In fact, the state Attorney General's office told the Globe the charity was likely either inactive, or dissolved. Yet, documents below show the charity is healthy, wealthy and active.

More

41 posted on 07/25/2009 3:03:50 PM PDT by cbkaty (I may not always post...but I am always here......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cbkaty

Thanks, that’s better yet.


45 posted on 07/25/2009 3:08:46 PM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: cbkaty

How come is says “non-profit” and “For profit YES”?
____________________________________________________________

Business Information
Filing Number: 000908494
Name: INKWELL FOUNDATION, INC.
Name Type: LEGAL
principal corporate address: 17 WARE ST
CAMBRIDGE, MA 02138-4004
Business Type: NONPROFIT CORPORATION
Reference Number: 000908494
Status: ACTIVE
Place Incorporated: MASSACHUSETTS
Date Incorporated: 10/27/2005
For Profit: YES
Additional Information: Annual Report Required: YES

Officers - As Of - 07/14/2009
Name Standardized Address Original Address
GATES JR, HENRY LOUIS
Title: PRESIDENT
12 QUINCY ST
CAMBRIDGE, MA 02138-3804 12 QUINCY ST.
CAMBRIDGE MA


50 posted on 07/25/2009 3:11:39 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: cbkaty

I heard on TV that you can’t arrest someone for disorderly conduct while in their own home. You have to be in a “public place” to be arrested for disorderly conduct.

If that house was the location of his charity, wouldn’t it make the residence a “public place”?


127 posted on 07/26/2009 6:24:35 AM PDT by Tai_Chung
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson