Posted on 07/25/2009 10:45:06 AM PDT by Brilliant
According to the AMA, in many communities around the United States, there is a physician shortage, which presents a serious health care problem. For a host of reasons, more than twenty million people are affected by the inability to access quality medical services. While the premise of a popular television show, “Northern Exposure,” alluded to this very predicament some time ago, most viewers were likelier caught up in the relationships between the quirky inhabitants of Cicely, Alaska instead of pondering the very real implications for those without access to a qualified doctor.1
Similar to the circumstances in which the main character, Dr. Joel Fleischman, upon graduating from Columbia University medical school (which he attended on a scholarship from the state of Alaska), finds himself assigned to be the General Practitioner of a tiny Alaskan town in order to pay for his education, “medical schools have adopted a selective medical school admission policy to enhance a primary care choice in underserved communities.”2 The reality, though, is that while some students eventually practice in underserved communities, others do not.
Limited access to medical care is not always because doctors are unavailable. When ill, people who live in urban areas are sometimes unable to travel on a crowded bus or take other forms of mass transit in order to receive medical care.3
Other reasons creating an inability to meet the demand for physician services include population growth, a larger number of people living beyond age sixty-five and needing the most services, doctors working fewer hours, some specialty areas, such as ER, are more attractive because of their less demanding schedules (primary care is more time-intensive), and our supply of physicians from U.S. medical schools is not growing.4
However, the reason which might cause the greatest concern is that there are several states which do not cap non-economic damage awards in medical negligence cases, which has created sky rocketing insurance premiums for medical providers. Many doctors refuse to practice in states like Nevada, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Oregon, Illinois, and Wisconsin, which make it more difficult to grow a financially lucrative practice without having to work twelve-hour days to generate more income to cover these additional insurance costs, or in which their careers can be jeopardized by settling in sometimes unwarranted lawsuits.
‘“When there’s a potential for an enormous jury award, of which trial attorneys may receive one-third or more, lawyers may be more willing to take a chance on a case involving a sad outcome, whether actual negligence was involved or not. “Defending these extra suits will surely tax our health care system because they will lead to higher medical liability premiums,” said Susan Turney, MD, who is Executive Vice President/CEO of the Wisconsin Medical Society.5
According to a survey taken by The American Hospital Association, there are seventeen “crisis states,” so defined by their legal and legislative environment. They experience difficulty with both recruiting physicians and with finances and operations. Hospitals blame increased professional liability expenses for lost physicians, reduced coverage in their emergency departments, and ability to provide obstetric services. As a result of an inability to recruit enough medical school graduates to fill their OB/GYN residency slots, hospitals in Pennsylvania are interviewing a greater proportion of residency applicants from international medical schools, whose level of education is much harder to ascertain.6
“A study published in early July [2003] by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) found that states with caps on noneconomic damage awards or total damage awards in malpractice cases benefit from about twelve percent more physicians per capita than states without such laws.”7
In states without caps, there are longer wait times for some medical services, such as colonoscopies, and available specialists and general practitioners can’t always accept new referrals because of their heavy workload.
It might seem logical to just graduate more doctors to help meet the growing demand for them, but the number of applicants is dropping. Also, many medical school applicants are forced to attend foreign medical schools because there are only 126 accredited medical schools in the U.S.
“There have been two newly accredited schools since 1980: Mercer University School of Medicine in Georgia, and Florida State University College of Medicine. That’s an annual increase of less than 0.1 percent–an order of magnitude smaller than the U.S. population growth rate of about .9 percent, according to the 2002 CIA World Factbook.”8
Alison Stewart speculates in Consumer Health Journal that one reason contributing to the shortage of medical schools located in the U.S. stems from the fact that they are so tightly regulated, such as requiring accreditation by doctor-run organizations like LCME, which is jointly run by the AAMC and the American Medical Association.
In addition to this, “It costs quite a bit to start a new medical school” said Dr. David Stevens, vice president of the medical school standards and assessment for the AAMC, and current secretary of the Liaison Committee on Medical Education, or LCME, the group in charge of accrediting new medical schools.”9
Furthermore, it is partially because of costs associated with being able to meet these regulations, that no foreign school has been able to create a campus in the United States and that existing schools find it difficult to expand their operations; they are seemingly unable to meet all the conventions which must be satisfied without putting their existing accreditation in jeopardy.
It is the opinion of George Howley, the 1999 director of Casper, Area Economic Development Alliance, that the reason for such resistance to Ross University, based in the Caribbean, establishing a campus in Wyoming was because “doctors are opposed to the potential competition, not to the supposed risk of lower-quality care.” He further explained the reasoning was “to protect the income to the doctors.”10
The litigation surrounding the practice of medicine, a shortage of doctors, and population growth all have contributed to the changing face of medical care. One result of the increased liability risks faced by doctors is what is referred to as “Managed Risk Medicine” which can result in “ordering superfluous tests or choosing treatments based on their likelihood to lead to a malpractice lawsuit.11
Additionally, when the FDA delays approval of new products, it has the effect of reducing their potential profitability, potentially influencing pharmaceutical companies to focus on refining previously approved products instead of investing in new ones.12
An online publication called Advantage, an industry brief on health care, lists a multitude of ways in which the delivery of medicine is changing in order to become more cost effective, easier to access, and streamlined. The following are just some of the interesting developments.
–Stores such as CVS, Target, Cub Foods, and Wal-mart are testing non-urgent care clinics, staffed by physician extenders (physician assistants and nurses), to treat minor conditions such as colds and sore throats.
–Individuals can store and manage their own electronic medical records online or on a Medic Alert e-Healthkey, which is a key fob that both controls access to network services and information and is a USB flash drive patients can carry with them.
–For a fee, medical billing advocates can help patients decode their hospital/ medical bills and suggest ways to make insurers cover out-of-pocket charges and fight hospital overcharges.
–Employers are offering preventive health screenings at work, such as blood pressure checks, cholesterol tests, and online health screenings. They are also offering wellness seminars.
–The AAMC proposes raising medical school enrollment by 15 percent over the next 10 years, or 2,500 new medical school graduates each year.
–Physicians groups have begun buying their own medical facilities, such as “specialty hospitals, ambulatory surgery centers and diagnostic imaging centers in a bid to gain greater control of their practices and to provide alternate revenue streams in an increasingly regulated industry.”13
–Consumer-directed health plans are being offered by more and more employers. In such plans, employees have the freedom to see any provider, but have the benefit of lower out-of-pocket expenses by using preferred providers.14
Consumer-Driven Health Plans A Health Care Reimbursement Account (HCRA) or flexible spending account “is a tax-exempt account funded by an employee or employer that the employee uses to pay health care expenses. Employees cannot withdraw cash from an HCRA to pay for things other than health care. The employee decides in advance how much money to put into the HCRA and loses any unspent money in the HCRA at the end of the year. This creates a “use it or lose it” incentive for higher health care spending toward the end of the year and prevents employees from using the account to save money.”15
Employee contributions to a Medical Savings Account (MSA) “are exempt from federal income tax, social security tax and (in many states) also state income tax. MSAs are accompanied by a high-deductible health insurance policy, not a generous low-deductible insurance policy. MSA funds that are unspent at the end of the year ‘roll over’ to future years and are not lost. MSAs allow individuals to withdraw funds for purposes other than health care (after payment of taxes and a fifteen percent penalty). MSAs move with an employee if he/she changes employers.”16
Health Reimbursement Arrangement (HRA), “are not taxed, must be used for substantiated medical expenses, are accompanied by a high-deductible insurance policy, and accumulate unspent money for future years. The IRS guidance also says that employees can use HRA funds for health care after leaving an employer, but this is still evolving. Some HRA plans create virtual accounts in which payments for health care are controlled by an employee, but the money actually stays with the employer. In these situations, unspent account money may stay with the employer if the employee leaves.”17
Experts predict more than forty million health savings accounts (HSAs) will be established in the next ten years, making them the most popular form of health care financing available. With an HSA, workers under age sixty-five can accumulate tax-free savings for lifetime health care needs if they are part of a qualified insurance plan (one with a minimum deductible of $1,000 for individuals and $2,000 for families). Individuals with self-only policies can set aside up to $2,600 in their HSA, while families can set aside up to $5,150 a year. Health Care News reported that major drawbacks to the accounts include high deductibles, higher employee risk than with other plans and lack of consumer education about the accounts. It has also been determined that thirty-five percent of patients with an HSA avoided obtaining care due to cost compared to seventeen percent of patients with traditional health insurance.18
Health Savings Security Accounts (HSSAs), “could be accompanied by a high-deductible insurance policy (minimum of $500 for individual or $1,000 for family coverage), but need not be accompanied by high-deductible insurance if an individual is currently uninsured.”19
In addition, “HSSAs would allow an employer, individual (employee), or both to make tax-deductible contributions to the account of up to $2,000 per year for individual coverage or $4,000 per year for family coverage. Money could be withdrawn from an HSSA for purposes other than medical expenses after payment of income tax plus a fifteen percent penalty. The tax deductibility of contributions to HSSAs decreases for individuals with incomes over $75,000 and families with incomes over $150,000. When an account holder turns sixty-five, they can withdraw money from an HSSA for non-medical purposes after paying taxes but no fifteen percent penalty. HSSAs would be portable when an employee changes employers.”20
In the field of health insurance, a fixed amount paid to an organization (such as an HMO) to provide all types of care for an individual is called “capitation” payment. A fixed amount paid to one type of provider (such as a Pediatrician) to provide only the care need from that type of provider is called “sub-capitation” payment because it only covers a subset of needed services. With a Customized Sub-Capitation Plan (CSCP), an individual is given a choice among providers of each type and is shown the sub-capitation premiums that each provider charges. The customized premium that the individual pays is the sum of the sub-capitation rates for the providers the individual selects.
Possible advantages of CSCPs include: flexibility in selecting providers based on quality, prices, and personal preference; and relatively complete insurance coverage without the out-of-pocket coverage gap common among most Consumer Driven Health Plans.21
Association health plan legislation continues to be introduced. Senate Bill l955, Health Insurance Marketplace Modernization and Affordability Act of 2005, would amend “the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) to provide for the establishment and governance of small business health plans, which are group health plans sponsored by trade, industry, professional, chamber of commerce or similar business associations that meet ERISA certification requirements.”22
Although the doctor shortage raises great concern, the market seems to be responding to the rising health care costs with innovative solutions, which may help alleviate the additional financial stress placed on the consumer. If the AAMC truly has the power to help boost medical school graduates by fifteen percent over the next ten years, that will help. However, until litigation caps are imposed in the seventeen “crisis” states, there will still be shortages of doctors in areas where medical liability premiums discourage establishing a practice.
snort. scoff. Yeah, and expanding the capacity of the International Space Station by 50% is easy and cheap.
There’s a difference between what you’re saying and what doctors and their professional associations are actually doing. And my doctor friends (anesthesiologist, internal medicine and radiologist) are doing just fine financially - two out of the three just bought large homes with acreage in Santa Barbara, and two out of three drive new BMWs. I’m a professional with a graduate degree and 20 years experience (and no I didn’t spend as long in school as MDs do), and these guys make twice what I do, or more. So I guess it’s worth the effort. You have some valid points, but when I start seeing more medical para professionals graduate (including RNs) then I’ll have a bit more sympathy.
Precisely. And PA’s make good money, and RN pay ain’t hay either. More of those guys please. I guess I’m coming from a different place than many. I know how to administer shots - learned by doing it on animals. I can suture, splint a leg, pull a tooth, read PDR to figure a dose on an antibiotic, and so on. None of that is magic. Yes some care needs applied.
At some point, the physician shortage even becomes a thorn in the side of doctors, but in general, doctors do have an incentive to encourage the shortage because it pushes up salaries. Of course, there are exceptions. The boss doctor certainly benefits from an availability of underlings, just as hospitals generally don’t benefit from high doctor salaries. In fact, that is one of the main reason why hospitals have been closing. The effort to limit the number of doctors in the 50s, 60s, 70s, and 80s got out of control, and now its come back to bite the profession.
Any competent and objective economist could have told you at that time that restricting the number of doctors would not operate to reduce medical expenses, though. That is how the politicians sold that policy to the public back then.
What does the ISS have to do with it?
How owuld more medical paraprofessionals change the balance of the equation? I am happy your doctor friends are doing well, but I think that you may have a misperception. The anesthesiologist, for example, works long, arduous hours under great pressure, often at minimal notice when life hangs in the balance. How would a paraprofessional change this? Hire a CRNA? Would you want someone with 75% less total training helping you in this crucial time? As a professional, do you work nights, weekends and holidays? What is your malpractice?
The AMA is in the business of preventing an over supply of doctors. If you wanted to increase the number of medical schools again, you would have a fight from them. Actually there are ten’s of thousand of under employed Russian doctors. But you mention letting them practice in this country and you will catch hell.
The folks that argue physicians don’t make much generally use a little sleight of hand. For example, some might argue that the average doctor pays malpractice premiums that are 90% of their income. If you think about it though, that means that a doctor who pays $180,000 a year in malpractice premiums makes $200,000 per year. Of course, he’d rather make $380,000.
The Armed Forces Health Professions Scholarship Program (HPSP) is a scholarship between two to four years in length offered to students in schools of medicine, osteopathic medicine, dentistry,optometry, clinical or counseling psychology, and vetrinary medicine. HPSP students receive full tuition, school-related expenses, and a stipend as benefits. The stipend is currently (as of 7/08) approximately $1,900/month, paid in two parts on the 1st and 15th days on each month by direct deposit. Expenses are reimbursed by the submission on an itemized form with receipts and a signed approval letter from your school stating that the expenses you claim are reasonable ones for your curriculum; typically, most texts and equipment (i.e., stethoscopes, lab coats) are paid without any fuss. Tuition is paid directly to your school.
I think that a lot of the problem is not so much that there are disincentives to go to medical school, but that there are limits on the number of medical schools and the enrollment that the accrediting authorities will allow. If you would relax those limits, you’d have more enrollment even if you don’t put a single additional public dime into the program. Tell the schools, “We’re going to let you increase your enrollment by 15%, but we’re not giving you any more money. It’s up to you and your students to find a way to finance it.” That way, there is no additional burden on the taxpayer. If I’m right, then students and medical schools will find a way to finance increased enrollment without additional public money, and enrollment will increase. If I’m wrong, then we’re no worse off.
That is how I went through medical school and I ended up paying back the USN 8 years. All in all a good deal in my case because I could not have afforded medical school otherwise.
But, please, don't try to tell anyone their education will be "free".
What is an “oversupply” though? It’s all in the eye of the beholder when the bureaucrats are making the decisions. Why not set a minimum competency level and let the market decide how many doctors we have? Currently, that is not how it’s done. Currently, the number of doctors is limited by the capacity of the medical education system, which is deliberately restricted in order to reduce the number of doctors.
It’s interesting that France is commonly held up by the liberals as a model for the US to follow. They mean that we should adopt France’s socialist system, and their health insurance system. France does in many respects have a better system than ours. However, it has nothing to do with socialism or health insurance. It has more to do with the fact that they have nearly twice as many doctors per capita as we do.
If France can do that without sacrificing quality, then I don’t see why we can’t.
That's essentially the situation with attorneys. How's that working out?
I’ll bet you the internist is the one that did not buy acerage or drive a BMW. Certain specialties do bring in the bucks, but most of us make less than the plumber on an hourly basis. The incentive for the best and the brightest to go to medical school is not there nearly as much as it was 30-40 years ago. The compensation and hours just do not make it compared to other professions.
And as far as paraprofessionals, if you want a PA or nurse practitioner caring for your family, OK. But I do not (and they are wonderful individuals, they just do not have the training and experience that comes with medical education and residency)
Hey, why worry! Hussein will just pass a few more laws...one forcing people to become doctors, one telling them where they have to practice, one telling them what they have to practice, one telling them what they are NOT allowed to practice. You get the idea. I’m sure people will be waiting in line to sign up. Especially when they face 5-10 for refusing!
I was pointing out if you want it and have the ability there is a way. Like you it was the only choice I had and I'd bet you are damn good at your work.
Post 10
Your reference
That is the case in areas I am familiar with and the shortage would be much more acute, especially in small towns and rural communities, if it were not for recruitment of foreign doctors.
“This in my opinion is something the Republicans bear a burden of blame for. College and University Medical program offerings could easily be expanded 50% and still be very competitive. “
Republicans, along with many others, have to share responsibility for the current situation but I believe the judiciary is most responsible. The unwarranted damages awarded by the courts has driven both the cost of medical care and health care insurance to intolerable levels.
“Employee contributions to a Medical Savings Account (MSA) “are exempt from federal income tax, social security tax and (in many states) also state income tax”
MSAs have to be a part of any meaningful reform. They would put the patient in direct control of health care payment (and therefore promote competition) instead of a second party (the insurance companies) who has little control over expenditures.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.