Why do Creationists not consider the moral dimension?
The whole article is about how the CREATIONISTS PRODUCERS DID NOT MISREPRESENT THE STATEMENTS OF YOUR TEMPLE OF DARWIN CO-RELIGIONISTS. So by all mean, please demonstrate where they twisted their words, and I won’t call you a typical evo-liar for Darwin’s anti-science creation myth.
Is that what happened here? Have you read the interviewees' description in the July Newsletter of the History of Science Society, vol 38, No 3? Have you read the account of the controversy in CMI? Have you seen the film? Can you demonstrate how the interviewees statements were deceptively edited? You've now made the issue a question of the morality of your propagandist use of loaded words to deceptively describe an event that has not developed to your liking.