I saw the interview last night—Huckabee did nothing to stop that a$$wipe Littman. He left it up to the other guest, who was continually interrupted. As an interviewer, if Huckabee doesn’t want to take sides, that’s fine. But he should abruptly shut down a guest whose first comment is a sexist ad hominem attack.
Huckabee is great on the campaign stump, but horrible as a debater.
8 years ago Huckabee, then a few hundred pounds heavier, was on Meet the Press along side with John Kerry and Joe Biden. Huckabee let Kerry and Biden run circles around him when debating the first Bush tax cuts.
I saw it too, and was disgusted by it. I’ve never liked Huckabee, but last night his transparent political ambition showed him up for the vile human being he really is. It didn’t look like he would’ve said anything to Littman if the other guest (a Palin supporter) hadn’t objected first. Even then, Huckabee’s objection was extremely tepid. You could almost see his inner president wannabe rubbing his hands together and cackling. It was reprehensible.
I agree. Huck was short on allowing more challenge by the conservative guest and he allowed that nitwit Littman to interrupt and laugh at the guest. This proves that the RATS are running and are trying to act like silly children having to get their point across by over talking. Huck needs to get a spine and cut the ass off.
Ditto?
But Huckabee shouldn’t have been the host in the first place as he has a conflict of interest (running for POTUS) and should have recused himself.
Something I am noticing on many threads is how observant the the Romneybots are, or in your case a Rudy guy. A lot of it seems to be a campaign against social conservatism.
Giuliani was the strongest CONSERVATIVE candidate we had. However, single issue pseudo-cons felt that it was more important to post pictures of him in a theatrical performance dressed as a woman. Pseudo-cons gave 2008 to BHO, and they’re working on a repeat performance in 2012. 11 posted on Monday, December 22, 2008 6:02:39 PM by Buck W.