Posted on 07/24/2009 1:27:45 PM PDT by STARWISE
CNN president kills birther story
TVNewser reports that CNN President Jon Klein has declared a halt to birther coverage -- a tacit shot at Lou Dobbs.
Klein forwarded Dobbs's producers a memo under this heading, which I suspect won't calm the conspiracists:
Since the show's mission is for Lou to be the explainer and enlightener, he should be sure to cite this during your segment tonite. And then it seems this story is dead - because anyone who still is not convinced doesn't really have a legitimate beef.
It'll be difficult if the Courts won't even look at the evidence, won't it? That's where we are now.
Exactly!
It’s TOO LATE to claim the original was “destroyed” when they’re issuing press releases claiming they’ve “seen the original birth certificate on file, and it’s fine.”
Don’t let these bastards “scrub” the birth certificate like they “scrub” the internet. If they try that angle, they’re clearly lying.
Hey Lib trolls: NOBODY BELIEVES YOU.
I know people don’t like to give up on paper.... LOL... (just in general, and not just on Obama...), but that’s the way it’s going to go. And people will think differently after they have been born, raised and used *exclusively* all digital. They’ll wonder about our “attachment” to paper...
Unless Congress passes a law, or some Court makes a ruling, that requiring certified copies of Birth Certificates is discriminatory, under the 14th amendment's Equal Protection clause. Poor black and brown folks are less likely to have been born in a hospital you know.
Never mind that even for those groups the fraction not born in a hospital, or without a doctor or midwife in attendence is vanishingly small. Probaby there are more white "Sovereign Citizen" types that would refuse to "register" their children, than minorities who would not have a birth certificate".
Yeah, that’s it precisely and that’s the reason why I say I like the game plan of the state laws...
Well, I would say that the law could be worked out where if a person never had a birth certificate that it could specify other means by which the details could be verified.
My philosophy on that one is “where there’s a will, there’s a way”... and if the intent of the law is to get *documented proof* you can make the law do that...
And who knows where that document emanated,
which country, who’s stated as the father, etc.?
As far as I can tell, it’s a meaningless
fluffball of a statement as to any qualitative
or pertinent identifying information.
It would be like me in a poker game, and
saying to someone who asked me what I had:
“Yes, I’m holding some playing cards.”
Nah, TOTUS is the Charismatic Puppet. Obama is just a good actor, except that he can't remember his lines, nor maintain his charisma, without TOTUS. We've seen that many time.
Notice it doesn’t say she saw the “long” form, she could just have seen the certificate of live birth that everyone else has seen at this point.
You said — Notice it doesnt say she saw the long form, she could just have seen the certificate of live birth that everyone else has seen at this point.
—
Well my interpretation of the wording used is that it’s the long form.
... has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record ...
The wording of “original birth certificate” to me means the long form... but if I’m wrong, I sure would like to hear what someone else has found out about that specific thing...
That's fine, but it's really like locking the barn door after the horses have run off. Fine for next time, not much help now. And the Republic needs help, now, not just in 2012.
Sure they need help now and nothing stops Republicans/conservatives from battling it out in the political arena in regards to legislation and policies and so on...
But, in regards to getting Obama out of office, I haven’t seen any good results in that area. In fact, I see nothing that will work — short of that state law that I’m talking about.
Now, if someone can do it, then they should have done it a long time ago... LOL..
It appears to me that no one can do it, which was one of those points that I was making...
“In November 2008 the Director of Health for the State of Hawaii said they had his original long form and that she saw it. Yet CNN says it was destroyed in 2001? Big lies!!!”
Oh wait, i just figured out what happened....
The director of health saw the birth certificate, announced the long-form document is legit, but then FIGURED THEY DIDN’T NEED IT ANY MORE, SO THEY GOT IN A TIME MACHINE, TRAVELED BACK 8 YEARS AGO, and SHREDDED THE PRESIDENT’S LONG-FORM CERTIFICATE to create bedding for their child’s hamster cage.
Ah! Finally this makes sense.
No, she said *original birth certificate*. The Cerfication, a purported image of which is all anyone else has seen, is not the Original. It's not even a copy of the original. At best it's a copy of part of the information on the original, and it's not extracted directly from the original, but from a database, which has data input from the original.
That was “TexasFreeper2009” that you are responding to, as I didn’t say that...
See post #150... :-)
post 139 continued.—> After years of failed attempts to get the Communist Party - http://www.cpusa.org/ - or Socialist Party - http://www.sp-usa.org/ off the ground in America, leadership in the movement adopted a different, much more successful strategy.
Unable to compete openly with Americas two powerful political partys nationally on the merit of communist and socialist principles and values, leaders in the movement decided to work from within one of the two parties.
As both communism and socialism prey on the proletariat (working class) for political power, the old party of the people seemed like the best party to work within.
The Democratic Socialists of America http://www.dsausa.org/dsa.html The Democratic Socialists of America was formed as a spin-off of the Socialist Party USA for the stated purpose of working from inside the Democrat Party through its legislative arm, the Progressive Congressional Caucus. The Progressive Congressional Caucus, which now has more than sixty members seated in congress, all of whom played a significant roll in causing the current financial crisis.
PROGRESSIVE CAUCUS (DEMOCRATIC) (PC-D)http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6497 Through incremental victories from within the power structure of the Democrat Party, over an extended period, the Communist Party and Socialist Party agenda would be advanced below the radar of the average American voter, many of whom still vote Democrat just because their parents did, or because their fellow union employees do.
These voters have no idea what they are actually supporting in todays Democrat Party, even though the Democratic Socialists of America have been very open about their plans and their advances.
In a PDF file issued by the Democratic Socialists of America, they answer the question,,,,
What is Democratic Socialism? (188 k)
http://www.dsausa.org/pdf/widemsoc.pdf
The lie in the leftist campaign is the notion that socialism/communism are somehow acceptable, if achieved via democratic process. But its actually worse... Being thrust into chains by force is one thing; but voting yourself into bondage is something quite different.
Hat tip: American Patriots For Truth and Equality
http://apfte.net/
I think the story is still quite alive in the rest of the media. Those 600 or so poor suckers who still watch CNN will be missing out on some big news soon...
If the records have been destroyed, well... he had better start packing his things...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.