[r9etb]

Hm.... interesting stuff, but the wording makes it seem like the results may be a lot less definitive than the article itself would lead us to believe.

Stuff like, "They have discovered that this anomaly could be explained by..." and "...appears to be produced by gravitomagnetism."

That sort of vagueness is at odds with their dramatic conclusion: "It demonstrates that a superconductive gyroscope is capable of generating a powerful gravitomagnetic field, and is therefore the gravitational counterpart of the magnetic coil."

Now, they might be right ... but I think I'll wait for confirmation.

[cripplecreek]

I know what you’re saying but I enjoy this stuff just for the theoretical thinking it sends me off on.