Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Towards a New Test of General Relativity? (Generating Gravity in the Lab)
European Space Agency ^ | 23 March 2006

Posted on 07/23/2009 3:26:56 PM PDT by anymouse

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: anymouse

They may have gotten far ahead of themselves with theory. Gravity stands apart from the other forces because while they are contained within ordinary dimensions, gravity may be multidimensional. This is a good rationale to explain why gravitons have never been detected.

That is, our ordinary dimensions are contained within space and time, or really space-time, because space and time appear to be functions of the same thing. If you alter space, you alter time, and vice versa.

But gravity seems to be transcend this, to some extent. It is the force, unlike all others, that *can* alter space and time. Strong and weak nuclear forces, and electromagnetism, can’t. Gravity can bend time and space.

If gravity is indeed transcendent, it would explain dark matter, the majority of the universal mass that isn’t seen. The reason it would not be seen is because it is not really there, except virtually, an appearance of mass created by extra-dimensional gravity. The mass exists, just not in ordinary dimensions.

With this explanation, what the scientists have accomplished with their experiment is to increase “our share” of the multidimensional gravitational field in our dimension. This also implies that by their actions, they are decreasing the gravitational field in another dimension.

It means that even though the field is stronger, there are still no gravitons to be found.


21 posted on 07/23/2009 4:41:44 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
ALCON: rotating up to 6 500 times a minute may cause a London moment

anymouse: get your priorities in order please? he he

22 posted on 07/23/2009 4:57:48 PM PDT by pappyone (New to Freep, still working a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodebrecht

Einstein’s philosophical style of thinking has a lot in common with Aristotle.


23 posted on 07/23/2009 5:06:19 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: dr_lew

Don’t go down that road please ... I just re-read Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance and all this thinking about thinking about thinking has me tied up in knots... Aristotlean or otherwise...

Wake me up when we have flying cars and fusion reactors...


24 posted on 07/23/2009 6:00:31 PM PDT by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Neidermeyer
Don’t go down that road please ...

OK, just stick with good ol' Aristotle!

Place is thought to be something important and hard to grasp, both because the matter and the shape present themselves along with it, and because the displacement of the body that is moved takes place in a stationary container, for it seems possible that there should be an interval which is other than the bodies which are moved. The air, too, which is thought to be incorporeal, contributes something to the belief: it is not only the boundaries of the vessel which seem to be place, but also what is between them, regarded as empty. Just, in fact, as the vessel is transportable place, so place is a non-portable vessel. So when what is within a thing which is moved, is moved and changes its place, as a boat on a river, what contains plays the part of a vessel rather than that of place. Place on the other hand is rather what is motionless: so it is rather the whole river that is place, because as a whole it is motionless.

25 posted on 07/23/2009 6:20:39 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Neidermeyer

BTW, I loved Zen & the A of MM. I read it when I was in grad school, and I remember one day when I didn’t go into school but sat home with an atlas following his trip through Montana and Idaho.


26 posted on 07/23/2009 9:14:30 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

bmflr


27 posted on 07/23/2009 10:43:26 PM PDT by Kevmo (So America gets what America deserves - the destruction of its Constitution. ~Leo Donofrio, 6/1/09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: admiral52

Maybe a spindizzy drive????

Well I hope this can lead to tech that can help us colonize at least the solar system as we are the first beings on this planet to have the capability of thought and the ability to alter ourselves and environment, it would be a crying shame to stay here and live in mud huts till the sun blew up....


28 posted on 07/26/2009 10:07:38 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson